ellenkushner: (Palin Trickster sign)
[personal profile] ellenkushner
The one good thing about this influx of spam I've been getting on random LJ posts is that when it pops up in Incoming it gives me the chance to revisit old posts I'd forgotten all about having written.  And I discover that I'm a lot less boring than I thought!  My posts are terser, and wittier than they were when I wrote them!  Cool stuff.  Like Oct. 2, 2008 Watching the VP Debates: stream of agonized consciousness, my very first view of - and reaction to - Sarah Palin, which I typed live while watching the debates that night (now, I suppose, I'd just tweet): 

She's got a great screen persona. Looks right into the camera with a winning smile. She looks and sounds exactly like someone on a commercial for floorwax or personal care or dessert from a mix or something.

"NUKE-you-ler" - is this a class marker? Are there any Republicans who say "nuclear"?

Oh, great. Now she's selling Israel like toothpaste. "Israel. Our ally. Gets my teeth whiter than white."

We're screwed.

Date: 2011-02-12 09:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fidgetmonster.livejournal.com
I had a teacher rant once at a classmate who pronounced it nuke-u-ler. He said: Switch around the first two letters in nuclear and you get unclear. You don't say UNK-u-ler, do you?!?

Date: 2011-02-12 10:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wildwose.livejournal.com
Hah! I had the same reaction to this! I was getting all grumpy about the recent spam messages, (I wasn't sure if it was coming in for others like this, so glad to know I am not the only one) and then I realized that each time I got one, i was re-reading my old entries. It has been fun.





Please don't let the spammers know........

Date: 2011-02-12 11:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elswhere1.livejournal.com
Why is it that one's old writing is always better??

Date: 2011-02-12 11:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellen-kushner.livejournal.com
(I won't if you won't!)

Glad I'm not the only one!

Date: 2011-02-12 11:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellen-kushner.livejournal.com
Astral delusion, my dear Nick.

Date: 2011-02-12 11:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
And I discover that I'm a lot less boring than I thought!

...
To me, you're the antithesis of boring, so brain is broken now at the thought you'd ever think that.

Date: 2011-02-13 03:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deliasherman.livejournal.com
It is a thing most writers think about themselves from time to time. Think of it as an occupational hazard. That's what I try to do.

Date: 2011-02-13 03:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kateelliott.livejournal.com
1) you nailed what Palin is all about, that's for sure

2) gosh, I never thought of doing that while I nuke the spam (re-reading my old posts). You're brilliant!

Date: 2011-02-13 04:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
I hadn't realized it was *writers* it patterned with, I guess!

Date: 2011-02-13 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] freda-writes.livejournal.com
British commentators have long mocked 'Dubya' and others for saying 'nuke-you-ler'. Now you sometimes hear Brits say it, as we pick up American (mis) pronunciations. Drives me nuts!

Date: 2011-02-13 04:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deliasherman.livejournal.com
Well, all artists I've ever spoken with, of any stripe, medium, or platform, seem to have dark nights of the soul. But the writer's dark night is the one I'm the most familiar with.

Date: 2011-02-13 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellen-kushner.livejournal.com
So glad I'm not the only one getting this weird influx of spam - I was beginning to wonder!

Date: 2011-02-13 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellen-kushner.livejournal.com
My condolences.

Just pray they don't pick up "jew-le-ry" and "re-la-tor" (for "realtor"), too.

Date: 2011-02-13 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ellen-kushner.livejournal.com
I don't think the *rest* of my writing is ever boring - and I don't usually have dark nights of the soul over LJ posts . . . I just worry that, since they're such little blasts of blurt, they might not , uh, that is, they might be, well: trivial, self-indulgent, badly organized, badly edited . . .which, in some ways of course, they are. But if they're charming, too, I guess that covers a multitude of sins.

Date: 2011-02-13 04:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
I was also seeing "I'm boring" as quite different from the general "I suck I can't do this I'll never manage it" dark nights of the soul, possibly because I've had the former since before I ever identified as a writer, and the latter mostly after :)

Date: 2011-02-13 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deliasherman.livejournal.com
See, this is what happens when you reply to a post without re-reading the whole thread. So, more accurately, *I* often fear I'm boring, which is why I don't write much in public about Daily Life or My Thoughts, which are mine and thought by me, D. Sherman.

Date: 2011-02-13 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deliasherman.livejournal.com
Not as long as they say "estate agent," they won't. 8-)

Date: 2011-02-13 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shweta-narayan.livejournal.com
But I think you're right though -- it is part of the artist-fear, because boring = failing to engage readers/viewers/listeners; I just hadn't thought of it that way before you said it.

...which is why I don't write much in public about Daily Life or My Thoughts

And here I thought that was because your writing time's Full Already!

Also, not that it's any surprise, just to have actually said it out loud: I love your Life/Thoughts posts :)

Date: 2011-02-13 06:03 pm (UTC)

October 2014

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314151617 18
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 10th, 2026 10:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios