First Person description?
Jan. 31st, 2008 01:52 pmFollowing the excellent leads of colleagues like Justine Larbalestier &
kateelliott, I post a question about writing that someone recently sent me:
I am finishing a story for Friday and it's written in first person present tense. I just realized yesterday that my main character being an "I", I haven't described him physically at all. I know, it's the old same problem again, but how do you cope with that kind of problem? What do you actually do? Have him look into a mirror? Too obvious! Or something like: "You really are the way I imagined you." "Ah yes, what do you mean, my blond hair, big nose and small eyes?" I am just kidding, of course. :-)
Thanks so much for any quick tip.
My answer:
Why does it matter what the character looks like?
What's yours?
I am finishing a story for Friday and it's written in first person present tense. I just realized yesterday that my main character being an "I", I haven't described him physically at all. I know, it's the old same problem again, but how do you cope with that kind of problem? What do you actually do? Have him look into a mirror? Too obvious! Or something like: "You really are the way I imagined you." "Ah yes, what do you mean, my blond hair, big nose and small eyes?" I am just kidding, of course. :-)
Thanks so much for any quick tip.
My answer:
Why does it matter what the character looks like?
What's yours?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:03 pm (UTC)For example, I am stubbornly convinced that Paul Atreides is a redhead. ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:11 pm (UTC)If the story requires a description or parts of one, it will be flow into the story where it makes sense. If it doesn't, it won't and is unneeded.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:14 pm (UTC)Heck, our hostess here has written some right fine books about a city that as yet has no name in print. Judicious avoidance of description can be a virtue of its own.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:21 pm (UTC)As we so often do.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:25 pm (UTC)Most of the women I know rant and rave at their curves in mirrors. (Normally in the "I really hate my body" sort of way.)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 07:28 pm (UTC)Another 2 cents
Date: 2008-01-31 07:40 pm (UTC)As far as mirrors go, people do look in them now and then, but it's best done in passing, rather than a full body scan on page one.
Re: Another 2 cents
Date: 2008-01-31 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 08:18 pm (UTC)For example (and I'm not claiming these are good examples, just the first things to fly from my fingers):
I'm taller than John, and I know he doesn't like it. When we go out, I have to resist the temptation to slouch.
Or:
Marcie sighed. "Well, you would say that, being blonde."
In either case, of course, being tall or being blonde should be an important detail in the context of the story.
The kind of stuff I hate in first person is: He gazed at my auburn curls and then his gaze moved down to my burgundy sweatshirt, lingering on my silver bracelet..."
For one thing, she knows what color her hair is so has no reason for her as the pov character to specifically mention it in that context. For another, it's almost a point of view violation. Sure, she might know that his eyes move from her hair to her bracelet, but perhaps he was looking over her head out the window and then wanted to see if she was wearing a watch before asking her the time. And if the burgundy sweatshirt isn't significant, what is it doing taking up space?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 08:44 pm (UTC)If there's something unusual about the character's looks, that can always be used against them--"Look at your horrible scar" "Don't you know those blue eyes can curse you" (one of these sentences has NOT been used to describe any character I've ever made up, guess which one)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 09:18 pm (UTC)In first-person, the details have to be the ones the character would notice about themselves, OR which are commented on to that person by others. So if the guy is a warrior, he might notice muscle tone, injuries, relative size/weight of opponents etc. He's not likely to worry about his hair. In chick lit, the character might worry about whether her skin tone suits her lipstick. In other words, how does your character's appearance reflect their internal priorities? Does your character *care* what they look like? If not, why are you describing it?
Does your character's appearance reflect anything about their external world or circumstances? Technology - your chicklit character may be worried how she appears on a webcam, whereas your warrier may have only seen his reflection in water. What about aging? Any time that a character's body is changing rapidly, they will be more aware of it. Adolescence, obv, but also older people, pregnancy, and people recovering from a long illness, etc, etc.
Plus, the eternal rules. Less is usually more, and Show, don't tell.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 09:57 pm (UTC)Why do we need a physical presence for such a tightly locked POV?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 10:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 10:08 pm (UTC)